User contributions for 109.150.14.234
Results for 109.150.14.234 talk block log logs global block log filter log
1 November 2019
- 14:2014:20, 1 November 2019 diff hist −416 Piers Corbyn With all due respect, I don't think I am the one being not constructive here. I've opposed arguments and a valid rationale behind every. single. one. of my edits, contrarily to all the "undo-ers" who don't justify theirs. Please read my edit comments before blindy undoing them. And I'm not the first one raising these points. Tags: Undo references removed
- 14:1614:16, 1 November 2019 diff hist −416 Piers Corbyn The sentence "Removal of sourced content" doesn't justify restoring the deleted sentences, because their content differs from the source itself. E.g. the source talks about one single study being published in 2007, not about "mainstream science". Similarly, the source doesn't mention "meteorological studies" as implied by the deleted content, but a single one of such study instead. Therefore, the source is not used in a proper manner. Tags: Undo references removed
- 14:0914:09, 1 November 2019 diff hist +1,005 Talk:Piers Corbyn →Denial and using single-study quotes to dismiss the point, and repeated edit undo's: new section
- 13:5913:59, 1 November 2019 diff hist −416 Piers Corbyn Simply quoting "WP:FRINGE" doesn't justify restoring these sentences in any way, shape or form. The sentences in question make the article biased an non-neutral, and while it's true that you're having the police role here because of your history, it doesn't make you right. Tags: Undo references removed
 | This is the contributions page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address. |