User contributions for 108.220.64.7
Results for 108.220.64.7 talk block log logs global block log filter log
15 June 2024
- 18:4418:44, 15 June 2024 diff hist −1,295 Saves the Day Redundant. The same information is found later in the article in the band's history. The band is still active. current
- 18:4318:43, 15 June 2024 diff hist −1,295 Chris Conley Redundant. The same exact wording can be found later in the article.
10 June 2024
- 20:3520:35, 10 June 2024 diff hist −51 Saves the Day →Sexual misconduct allegations: This is more reflective of the true nature of the allegations. Review the source and the actual evidence and you'll see that there is no mention of child grooming anywhere. Conley admits to inappropriate behavior, and we should stick to the facts.
- 20:3420:34, 10 June 2024 diff hist −27 Saves the Day Improving the validity of the statement and the wording as well. It reflects the true nature of the accusaitions.
- 20:3320:33, 10 June 2024 diff hist −7 Chris Conley Improved the wording once again.
- 20:3320:33, 10 June 2024 diff hist +2 Chris Conley Improved the wording.
- 20:3220:32, 10 June 2024 diff hist −9 Chris Conley →Sexual misconduct allegations: Made it sound more concise.
- 20:3220:32, 10 June 2024 diff hist +28 Chris Conley This reflects the true nature of the accusations without adding any unverified, dubious details that only dilute the truth of the matter.
- 20:2920:29, 10 June 2024 diff hist −129 Chris Conley →Sexual misconduct allegations: I've looked at the statement and of the sources listed. There is no evidence or even mention of nude photos, so where did this information even come from. Shouldn't we stick to the basic allegation and not add any dubious details that dilute the truth at hand?
- 20:2620:26, 10 June 2024 diff hist −84 Saves the Day →Sexual misconduct allegations: I looked further into the article. Where does it say anything about nude images? Conley refers to screen shots, but that shows a chair knocked over. Does wikipedia publish unverified, amplified gossip? Where is the verifiable information?
- 20:2320:23, 10 June 2024 diff hist −59 Saves the Day →Sexual misconduct allegations: I've read the details in the source. It doesn't include any details about luring into a relationship. The facts should be taken from Chris Conley's personal statement where he admits truths, but where is evidence that he tried to lure into a relationship? Lure how? This is hearsay.
12 March 2024
20 January 2024
- 21:2621:26, 20 January 2024 diff hist −5 Saves the Day What is the significance of denoting whether the alleged victim was male or female. This is not necessary and can promote backlash towards a protected group. No need to denote the sexual orientation.
- 21:2421:24, 20 January 2024 diff hist −33 Chris Conley →Sexual misconduct allegations: Uncited, unsubstantiated age claim. Saying male is redundant since a pronoun is used later. No need to denote male or female when it is done less obviously in the next sentence.
24 December 2023
- 22:1422:14, 24 December 2023 diff hist −54 Saves the Day No substantiated claim of grooming. Facts are facts and he sent images. No real proof of when they met. Labeling the person as male has no purpose but to mark sexuality and has no relevance.
13 December 2023
- 23:4123:41, 13 December 2023 diff hist −26 Saves the Day →Sexual misconduct allegations: There is no evidence to say how old the person in question was. Please only include relevant information.
- 23:3923:39, 13 December 2023 diff hist −446 Chris Conley Based on no evidence. Constitutes misinformation hearsay. No crime or charges. Slander.
- 23:3923:39, 13 December 2023 diff hist −1,323 Chris Conley Based on no evidence. Constitutes misinformation hearsay. No crime or charges. Tag: section blanking
- 21:5721:57, 13 December 2023 diff hist −679 Saves the Day Hearsay misinformation. Needs proof or an actual crime. Tag: Reverted
- 21:5721:57, 13 December 2023 diff hist −1,356 Saves the Day →Sexual misconduct allegations: This is based on hearsay. Tags: Reverted section blanking
18 October 2022
- 18:2018:20, 18 October 2022 diff hist −498 Nathan Larson (criminal) →Political views and online advocacy Tag: Reverted
 | This is the contributions page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address. |