User contributions for 1.144.109.102

Search for contributionsshowhide

⧼contribs-top⧽

Username, IP address or CIDR range:

Namespace:

Invert selection

Associated namespace

Tag filter:

Invert selection

Only show edits that are latest revisions

Only show edits that are page creations

Hide minor edits

⧼contribs-date⧽

From date:

To date:

Show only edits pending review

Hide probably good edits

07:5907:59, 5 October 2019 diff hist +2‎ Lucia de Berk case ‎ →‎Statistical arguments: Punctuation
07:5707:57, 5 October 2019 diff hist 0‎ Lucia de Berk case ‎ →‎Chain-link proof: punctuation
07:5207:52, 5 October 2019 diff hist 0‎ Lucia de Berk case ‎ →‎Statistical arguments: Standardised spelling as "de Berk"
07:5207:52, 5 October 2019 diff hist 0‎ Lucia de Berk case ‎ →‎Chain-link proof: Standardised spelling as "de Berk"
07:5107:51, 5 October 2019 diff hist 0‎ Lucia de Berk case ‎ →‎Charges: Standardised spelling as "de Berk"
07:5107:51, 5 October 2019 diff hist 0‎ Lucia de Berk case ‎ →‎Compensation: Standardised spelling as "de Berk"
07:5107:51, 5 October 2019 diff hist 0‎ Lucia de Berk case ‎ →‎Case reopened: Standardised spelling as "de Berk"
07:5007:50, 5 October 2019 diff hist 0‎ Lucia de Berk case ‎ →‎Posthumus II Commission: Standardised spelling as "de Berk"
07:5007:50, 5 October 2019 diff hist 0‎ Lucia de Berk case ‎ →‎Dutch Forensic Institute report: Standardised spelling as "de Berk"
07:4907:49, 5 October 2019 diff hist 0‎ Lucia de Berk case ‎ →‎Chain-link proof
07:4807:48, 5 October 2019 diff hist 0‎ Lucia de Berk case ‎ →‎Life sentence: standardised spelling as "de Berk"
07:3707:37, 5 October 2019 diff hist +25‎ Prosecutor's fallacy ‎ →‎The Sally Clark case: of the probability for
06:4806:48, 5 October 2019 diff hist +100‎ Prosecutor's fallacy ‎ →‎Defense attorney's fallacy: — in which case "reasonable doubt" could be claimed to exist despite the positive test result
04:3104:31, 5 October 2019 diff hist +260‎ Talk:Prosecutor's fallacy ‎ →‎Defense attorney's fallacy: :I have added a sentence to indicate how to interpret the probability that a group of suspects might not include the guilty person. —DIV (~~~~)
04:2804:28, 5 October 2019 diff hist −2‎ Prosecutor's fallacy ‎ →‎Defense attorney's fallacy: 1 in 10 (10 percent) to 1 in a million (0.0001 percent)
04:2704:27, 5 October 2019 diff hist −1‎ Prosecutor's fallacy ‎ →‎Defense attorney's fallacy: punctuation
04:2604:26, 5 October 2019 diff hist +280‎ Prosecutor's fallacy ‎ →‎Defense attorney's fallacy: The defendant might argue that "lists of suspects compiled by police fail to include the guilty person in 50% of cases." — if that were true, then the defendant's guilt would have increased from the prior probability of 5% (half of 10%) to 49.99955% on the basis of the test.
04:1904:19, 5 October 2019 diff hist +154‎ Prosecutor's fallacy ‎ →‎Defense attorney's fallacy: ''incorrectly'' ... substantial overhaul of logic and phrasing. —DIV
04:0904:09, 5 October 2019 diff hist +2‎ Prosecutor's fallacy ‎ →‎Defense attorney's fallacy: New para.
04:0704:07, 5 October 2019 diff hist 0‎ Prosecutor's fallacy ‎ →‎Mathematical analysis
04:0204:02, 5 October 2019 diff hist +6‎ Prosecutor's fallacy ‎ "claim"
04:0004:00, 5 October 2019 diff hist +4‎ Confusion of the inverse ‎ →‎Example 2: (%)

00:1800:18, 14 April 2019 diff hist 0‎ F2Freestylers ‎ →‎Jeremy Lyhch Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit

05:1405:14, 10 February 2018 diff hist 0‎ Aussie Racing Cars ‎No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit

5 October 2019

14 April 2019

10 February 2018