Portia (The Merchant of Venice)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Portia (Merchant of Venice))

Portia
The Merchant of Venice character
Kate Dolan as Portia (1886), by John Everett Millais
Created byWilliam Shakespeare

Portia is a female character and protagonist in The Merchant of Venice by William Shakespeare. In creating her character Shakespeare drew from the historical figure of Porcia,[1] the daughter of Cato the Younger, as well as several parts of the Bible.[2]

Portia is fond of proverbs, frequently quoting them, which was considered a sign of wisdom and sharp wit in the Elizabethan era. It has been suggested that the character of Portia was based on Queen Elizabeth, who was reigning at the time the play was written. [3]

Character[edit]

Portia (1888) by Henry Woods

Portia is a wealthy heiress in Belmont. She is bound by the lottery set forth in her father's will, which gives potential suitors the chance to choose one of three caskets, made of gold, silver and lead, respectively. If they choose the correct casket – the casket containing Portia's portrait and a scroll – they win her hand in marriage. Portia is glad when two suitors, one driven by greed and another by vanity, fail to choose correctly. She favors Bassanio, a young but impoverished Venetian noble but is not allowed to give him any clues to assist him in his choice.

Later in the play, she disguises herself as a man and then assumes the role of a lawyer, Balthazar, whereby she saves the life of Bassanio's friend Antonio in court. In the court scene, Portia finds a technicality in the bond, as it does not allow for the removal of blood, thereby outwitting the Jewish moneylender Shylock and saving Antonio from giving the pound of flesh demanded when everyone else, including the Duke presiding as judge, fails. It is Portia who delivers one of the most famous speeches in The Merchant of Venice:

The quality of mercy is not strained.
It droppeth as the gentle rain from heaven
Upon the place beneath. It is twice blest:
It blesseth him that gives and him that takes.

In the end, Portia and Bassanio go on to live together along with the former's lady-in-waiting Nerissa and her husband Gratiano.

Critics[edit]

La belle Portia (1886) Alexandre Cabanel

Despite Portia's lack of formal legal training, she wins her case with reference to the exact language of the law. The tactics she uses are, in modern terms, referred to as a "Philadelphia lawyer". These tactics help demonstrate her power in the court, which is in contrast with her earlier lack of choice in the marriage.

However, such tactics also lead to further discussions about the use and abuse of rhetoric. As a vital concept of civic life during the Elizabethan era, rhetoric often indicates an individual's wit (in a way, similar to the modern term "Intellect") [4], while at the same time intricately linked to moral issues as it possesses the potential to obfuscate distinctions between good and wrong. [5] For example, the abuse of rhetoric skills is brought to light by Portia – highlighting the idea that an unjust argument may win through eloquence, loopholes and technicalities, regardless of the moral question at hand – and thus provoking the audience to consider that issue.

Portrayals[edit]

Portia and Shylock, by Thomas Sully

The strength of the role of Portia has made it attractive to many notable actresses. Frances Abington, Sarah Siddons and Elizabeth Whitlock all played Portia in the 18th century when actresses first started appearing on stage in performances of the play. More recently, the role has been depicted in the cinema, on television, and in theatres by a number of notable actresses such as Maggie Smith, Claire Bloom, Sybil Thorndike, Joan Plowright, Caroline John, Lynn Collins, Lily Rabe, and Gemma Jones.

Cultural references[edit]

The character of Portia has had a considerable and long-lived cultural impact.

Notes and references[edit]

  1. ^ The Merchant of Venice 1.1/172–173, Folger Shakespeare Library
  2. ^ Drakakis 2011, pp. 163–164.
  3. ^ Leimberg 2011.
  4. ^ Goodey, C.F. (16 March 2016). "A History of Intelligence and 'Intellectual Disability'". doi:10.4324/9781315564838. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  5. ^ Crane, William G. (31 December 1937). Wit and Rhetoric in the Renaissance. Columbia University Press. ISBN 978-0-231-89968-0.
  6. ^ Hicks 2005, pp. 275–276.
  7. ^ New England Law n.d.
  8. ^ Kornstein 1993, p. 50.
  9. ^ Martin 2004.
  10. ^ Karkoschka 2001.
  11. ^ Kort 2005.
  12. ^ Delistraty 2014.

Sources[edit]

External links[edit]