McIntosh v. United States
| McIntosh v. United States | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Argued February 27, 2024 Decided April 17, 2024 | |
| Full case name | Louis McIntosh v. United States |
| Docket no. | 22-7386 |
| Citations | 601 U.S. 330 (more) |
| Argument | Oral argument |
| Decision | Opinion |
| Holding | |
| A court's failure to enter a preliminary order imposing criminal forfeiture before sentencing does not necessarily bar a judge from ordering forfeiture at sentencing. | |
| Court membership | |
| |
| Case opinion | |
| Majority | Sotomayor, joined by unanimous |
| Laws applied | |
| Fed. R. Crim. P. 32.2(b)(2)(B) | |
McIntosh v. United States, 601 U.S. 330 (2024), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that a court's failure to enter a preliminary order imposing criminal forfeiture before sentencing does not necessarily bar a judge from ordering forfeiture at sentencing.[1]
References
[edit]- ^ McIntosh v. United States, 601 U.S. 330 (2024).
External links
[edit]- Text of McIntosh v. United States, 601 U. S. 330 (2024) is available from: Cornell Findlaw Justia U.S. Report Page Proof Pending Publication (supremecourt.gov)
 | This article related to the Supreme Court of the United States is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |