Jump to content

Humic substance

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Fulvic acid)
Humic acid isolated from peat
Fulvic acid isolated from peat

Humic substances (HS) are colored relatively recalcitrant organic compounds naturally formed during long-term decomposition and transformation of biomass residues. The color of humic substances varies from bright yellow to light or dark brown leading to black. The term comes from humus, which in turn comes from the Latin word humus, meaning "soil, earth".[1] Humic substances represent the major part of organic matter in soil, peat, coal, and sediments, and are important components of dissolved natural organic matter (NOM) in lakes (especially dystrophic lakes), rivers, and sea water. Humic substances account for 50 – 90% of cation exchange capacity in soils.

"Humic substances" is an umbrella term covering humic acid, fulvic acid and humin, which differ in solubility. By definition, humic acid (HA) is soluble in water at neutral and alkaline pH, but insoluble at acidic pH < 2. Fulvic acid (FA) is soluble in water at any pH. Humin is not soluble in water at any pH.

This definition of humic substances is largely operational. It is rooted in the history of soil science and, more precisely, in the tradition of alkaline extraction, which dates back to 1786, when Franz Karl Achard treated peat with a solution of potassium hydroxide and, after subsequent addition of an acid, obtained an amorphous dark precipitate (i.e., humic acid). Aquatic humic substances were isolated for the first time in 1806, from spring water by Jöns Jakob Berzelius.

In terms of chemistry, FA, HA, and humin share more similarities than differences and represent a continuum of humic molecules. All of them are constructed from similar aromatic, polyaromatic, aliphatic, and carbohydrate units and contain the same functional groups (mainly carboxylic, phenolic, and ester groups), albeit in varying proportions.

Water solubility of humic substances is primarily governed by interplay of two factors: the amount of ionizable functional groups and (mainly carboxylic) and molecular weight (MW). In general, fulvic acid has a higher amount of carboxylic groups and lower average molecular weight than does humic acid. Measured average molecular weights vary with source, however, molecular weight distributions of HA and FA significantly overlap.

Age and origin of the source material determine the chemical structure of humic substances. In general, humic substances derived from soil and peat (which takes hundreds to thousands of years to form) have higher molecular weight, higher amounts of O and N, more carbohydrate units, and fewer polyaromatic units than humic substances derived from coal and leonardite (which takes millions of years to form).

Isolation id HS is the result of a alkaline extraction from solid sources of NOM the adsorption of HS on a resin.[2][3][4] A newer view of humic substances is that they are not mostly high-molecular-weight macropolymers but rather represent a heterogeneous mixture of relatively small molecular components of the soil organic matter auto-assembled in supramolecular associations and are composed of a variety of compounds of biological origin and synthesized by abiotic and biotic reactions in soil. and surface waters[5] It is the large molecular complexity of the soil humeome[6] that confers to humic matter its bioactivity in, its stabilty in ecosystems ,soil and its role as plant growth promoter (in particular plant roots).[7]

The academic definition of humic substances is under debate and some researchers argue against the traditional concepts of humification and seek to forgo alkali extract method and directly analyze the soil,[8]

Concepts of humic substances

[edit]

The formation of HS in nature is one of the least understood aspects of humus chemistry and one of the most intriguing. Historically, there have been three main theories to explain it: the lignin theory of Waksman (1932), the polyphenol theory, and the sugar-amine condensation theory of Maillard (1911).[9][10] Humic substances are formed by the microbial degradation of dead biota matter, such as lignin, cellulose. ligno-cellulose and charcoal.[11][12] Humic substances in the lab are resistant to further biodegradation. Their structure, elemental composition and content of functional groups of a given sample depend on the water or soil source and on the specific procedures and conditions of extraction. Nevertheless, the average properties of lab extractes HS from different sources are remarkably similar.

Fractionation

[edit]

Historically, scientists have used variations of similar methods for extracting HS from NOM and separation the extracts into HA and FA. The International Humic Substances Society advocates the use of standard laboratory methods for preparation of humic and fulvic acids. Humic substances are extracted from soil and other solid sources using 0.1 M NaOH, under and a nitrogen atmosphere, to prevent abiotic oxidation of some of the components of HS. The HA is then precipitated at pH 1, and the soluble fraction is treated on a resin column to separate fulvic acid components from other acid soluble compounds.[13] The fraction of NOM not extracted by 0.1 NaOH is humin. Humic acid plus fulvic acid is extracted from natural waters using a resin column after microfiltration and acidification to pH 2. The humic materials are eluted from the column with NaOH, and humic acid is precipitated at pH 1. After adjusting the pH to 2 fulvic acid is separated from other acid soluble compounds, using a resin column as with solid phase sources.[14] An analytical method for quantifying humic acid and fulvic acid in commercial ores and humic products, has been developed based on the IHSS humic acid and fulvic acid preparation methods.[15]

Scientists associated with the IHSS have also isolated the entire NOM from black water streams using reverse osmosis  The retentate from this process contains both humic and fulvic acids, predominately humic acid. The NOM from hard water streams has been isolated using  reverse osmosis and electrodialysis in tandem.[16]

Extracted humic acid not a single acid; rather, it is a complex mixture of many different acids containing carboxyl and phenolate groups so that the mixture behaves functionally as a dibasic acid or, occasionally, as a tribasic acid. Commercial humic acid used to amend soil is manufactured using these same well established procedures. Humic acids can form complexes with ions that are commonly found in the environment creating humic colloids.[17]

A sequential chemical fractionation called Humeomics can be used to isolate more homogeneous humic fractions and determine their molecular structures by advanced spectroscopic and chromatographic methods.[18] Substances identified in humic extracts and directly in soil include mono-, di-, and tri-hydroxycarboxylic acids, fatty acids, dicarboxylic acids, linear alcohols, phenolic acids, terpenoids, carbohydrates, and amino acids.[19] This suggests humic molecules may form a supramolecular structures held together by non-covalent forces, such as van der Waals force, π-π, and CH-π bonds.[20]

Chemical characteristics

[edit]

Since the dawn of modern chemistry, humic substances are among the most studied among natural materials. Despite long study, their molecular structure remains debatable The traditional view has been that humic substances are hetero- poly-condensates, in varying associations with clay.[21] A more recent view is that relatively small molecules also play major a role.[20]

A typical humic substance is a mixture of many molecules, some of which are based on a motif of aromatic nuclei with phenolic and carboxylic substituents, linked together;  The functional groups that contribute most to surface charge and reactivity of humic substances are phenolic and carboxylic groups. Humic substances commonly behave as mixtures of dibasic acids, with a pK1 value around 4 for protonation of carboxyl groups and around 8 for protonation of phenolate groups in HA. Fulvic acids are more acidic than HA. There is considerable overall similarity among individual humic acids. For this reason, measured pK values for a given sample are average values relating to the constituent species. The other important characteristic is charge density.[22]

Model structure of a humic acid, having a variety of components including quinone, phenol, catechol, and sugar moieties[22]
Model structure of a fulvic acid

The more recent determinations of molecular weights of HS show that the molecular weights are not as great as once thought.  Reported  number average molecular weights of soil HA are < 6000 but they are highly poly disperse with some components with much larger measure molecular weights and much lower.[23]  Measured number average molecular weights of aquatic HS with HA <= 1700 and FA< 900.[23]  The aquatic HA and FA are also highly poly disperse.  The number of individually distinct components in HS, as measured by mass spectroscopy is in the thousands  The average composition of HA and FA can be represented by model structures.

The presence of carboxylate and phenolate groups gives the humic acids the ability to form complexes with ions such as Mg2+, Ca2+, Fe2+, and Fe3+ creating humic colloids.. Many humic acids have two or more of these groups arranged so as to enable the formation of chelate complexes.[24] The formation of (chelate) complexes is an important aspect of the biological role of humic acids in regulating bioavailability of metal ions.[25]

Criticism

Decomposition products of dead plant materials form intimate associations with minerals, making it difficult to isolate and characterize soil organic constituents. 18th century soil chemists successfully used alkaline extraction to isolate a portion of the organic constituents in soil. This led to the theory that a 'humification' process created distinct 'humic substances' like 'humic acid', 'fulvic acid', and 'humin'.[8] However, modern chemical analysis methods applied to unprocessed mineral soil have not directly observed large humic molecules. This suggests that the extraction and fractionation techniques used to isolate humic substances alter the original chemical composition of the organic matter. Since the definition of humic substances like humic and fulvic acids relies on their separation through these methods, it raises the question of whether the distinction between these compounds accurately reflects the natural state of organic matter in soil.[26] Despite these concerns, the 'humification' theory persists in the field and in even textbooks, and attempts to redefine 'humic substances' in soil have resulted in a proliferation of conflicting definitions. This lack of consensus makes it difficult to communicate scientific understanding of soil processes and properties accurately."[8]

Determination of humic acids in water samples

[edit]

The presence of humic acid in water intended for potable or industrial use can have a significant impact on the treatability of that water and the success of chemical disinfection processes. For instance, humic and fulvic acids can react with the chemicals used in the chlorination process to form disinfection byproducts such as dihaloacetonitriles, which are toxic to humans.[27][28] Accurate methods of establishing humic acid concentrations are therefore essential in maintaining water supplies, especially from upland peaty catchments in temperate climates.

As a lot of different bio-organic molecules in very diverse physical associations are mixed together in natural environments, it is cumbersome to measure their exact concentrations in the humic superstructure. For this reason, concentrations of humic acid are traditionally estimated out of concentrations of organic matter, typically from concentrations of total organic carbon (TOC) or dissolved organic carbon (DOC).

Extraction procedures are bound to alter some of the chemical linkages present in the soil humic substances (mainly ester bonds in biopolyesters such as cutins and suberins). The humic extracts are composed of large numbers of different bio-organic molecules that have not yet been totally separated and identified. However, single classes of residual biomolecules have been identified by selective extractions and chemical fractionation, and are represented by alkanoic and hydroxy alkanoic acids, resins, waxes, lignin residues, sugars, and peptides.

Ecological effects

[edit]

Organic matter soil amendments have been known by farmers to be beneficial to plant growth for longer than recorded history.[29] However, the chemistry and function of the organic matter have been a subject of controversy since humans began postulating about it in the 18th century. Until the time of Liebig, it was supposed that humus was used directly by plants, but, after Liebig showed that plant growth depends upon inorganic compounds, many soil scientists held the view that organic matter was useful for fertility only as it was broken down with the release of its constituent nutrient elements into inorganic forms. At the present time, soil scientists hold a more holistic view and at least recognize that humus influences soil fertility through its effect on the water-holding capacity of the soil. Also, since plants have been shown to absorb and translocate the complex organic molecules of systemic insecticides, they can no longer discredit the idea that plants may be able to absorb the soluble forms of humus;[30] this may in fact be an essential process for the uptake of otherwise insoluble iron oxides.

A study on the effects of humic acid on plant growth was conducted at Ohio State University which said in part "humic acids increased plant growth" and that there were "relatively large responses at low application rates".[31]

A 1998 study by scientists at the North Carolina State University College of Agriculture and Life Sciences showed that addition of humate to soil significantly increased root mass in creeping bentgrass turf.[32][33]

A 2018 study by scientists at the University of Alberta showed that humic acids can reduce prion infectivity in laboratory experiments, but that this effect may be uncertain in the environment due to minerals in the soil that buffer the effect.[34]

Anthropogenic production

[edit]

Humans can affect the production of humic substances via a variety of ways: by making use of natural processes by composting lignin or adding biochar (see soil rehabilitation), or by industrial synthesis of artificial humic substances from organic feedstocks directly. These artificial substances may be similarly divided into artificial humic acid (A-HA) and artificial fulvic acid (A-FA).[35]

Lignosulfonates, a by-product from the sulfite pulping of wood, are valorized in the industrial fabrication of concrete where they serve as water reducer, or concrete superplasticizer, to decrease the water-cement ratio (w/c) of fresh concrete while preserving its workability. The w/c ratio of concrete is one of the main parameter controlling the mechanical strength of hardened concrete and its durability. The same wood pulping process can also be applied to obtain humus-like substances by hydrolysis and oxidation. A kind of artificial "lignohumate" can be directly produced from wood in this way.[36]

Agricultural litter can be turned into an artificial humic substance by a hydrothermal reaction. The resulting mixture can increase the content of dissolved organic matter (DOM) and total organic carbon (TOC) in soil.[35]

Lignite (brown coal) may also be oxidized to produce humic substances, reversing the natural process of coal formation under anoxic and reducing conditions. This form of "mineral-derived fulvic acid" is widely used in China.[37] This process also occurs in nature, producing leonardite.[38]

Economic geology

[edit]

In economic geology, the term humate refers to geological materials, such as weathered coal beds (leonardite), mudrock, or pore material in sandstones, that are rich in humic acids. Humate has been mined from the Fruitland Formation of New Mexico for use as a soil amendment since the 1970s, with nearly 60,000 metric tons produced by 2016.[39] Humate deposits may also play an important role in the genesis of uranium ore bodies.[40]

Technological applications

[edit]

The heavy-metal binding abilities of humic acids have been exploited to develop remediation technologies for removing lead from waste water. To this end, Yurishcheva et al. coated magnetic nanoparticles with humic acids. After capturing lead ions, the nanoparticles can then be captured using a magnet.[41]

Ancient masonry

[edit]

Archeology finds that ancient Egypt used mudbricks reinforced with straw and humic acids.[42]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ "Humus". Retrieved 2024-07-20 – via Dictionary.com Random House Dictionary Unabridged.
  2. ^ Piccolo A. (2016). "In memoriam of Prof. F.J. Stevenson and the question of humic substances". Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture. 3. doi:10.1186/s40538-016-0076-2.
  3. ^ Drosos M.; et al. (May 15, 2017). "A molecular zoom into soil Humeome by a direct sequential chemical fractionation of soi". The Science of the Total Environment. 586: 807–816. Bibcode:2017ScTEn.586..807D. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.02.059. PMID 28214121.
  4. ^ "Source Materials for International Humic Substances Society Samples". Retrieved 22 July 2020.
  5. ^ Piccolo A.; et al. (2018). "The Molecular Composition of Humus Carbon: Recalcitrance and Reactivity in Soils". The Molecular Composition of Humus Carbon: Recalcitrance and Reactivity in Soils. In: The Future of Soil Carbon, Wiley and Sons. pp. 87–124. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-811687-6.00004-3. ISBN 9780128116876.
  6. ^ Nebbioso A. and Piccolo A. (2011). "Basis of a Humeomics Science: Chemical Fractionation and Molecular Characterization of Humic Biosuprastructures". Biomacromolecules. 12 (4): 1187–1199. doi:10.1021/bm101488e. PMID 21361272. S2CID 45333263.
  7. ^ Canellas P.L and Olivares F.L. (2014). "TPhysiological responses to humic substances as plant growth promoter". Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture. 1: 3. doi:10.1186/2196-5641-1-3.
  8. ^ a b c Lehmann, J.; Kleber, M. (2015-12-03). "The contentious nature of soil organic matter". Nature. 528 (7580): 60–8. Bibcode:2015Natur.528...60L. doi:10.1038/nature16069. PMID 26595271. The development of this extraction method preceded theory, tempting scientists to develop explanations for the synthesis of materials resembling operationally extracted 'humic substances', rather than to develop an understanding of the nature of all organic matter in soil.[...] This lack of evidence means that 'humification' is increasingly questioned, yet the underlying theory persists in the contemporary literature, including current textbooks.[...] The issue has also been approached by redefining 'humic substances' as the portion of soil organic matter that cannot be molecularly characterized or by calling all soil organic matter 'humus'. We argue that this compromise – maintaining terminology but altering its meanings in varying ways – hampers scientific progress beyond the soil sciences. The [need for accurate models] of soil organic matter does not allow a confusing middle path; it requires leaving the traditional view behind to bring about lasting innovation and progress. This is critical as scientific fields outside the soil sciences base their research on the false premise of the existence of 'humic substances'. Thus an issue of terminology becomes a problem of false inference, with far-reaching implications beyond our ability to communicate scientifically accurate soil processes and properties.
  9. ^ Stevenson, F.J. (1994). Humus Chemistry: Genesis, Composition, Reactions, Wiley & Sons, New York, 1994, pp. 188-210. ISBN 0471594741.
  10. ^ Tan, K. H. (2014). Humic matter in soil and the environment: principles and controversies. 2nd ed. Boca Ranton: CRC Press. ISBN 1482234459.
  11. ^ Ponomarenko, E.V.; Anderson, D.W. (2001), "Importance of charred organic matter in Black Chernozem soils of Saskatchewan", Canadian Journal of Soil Science, 81 (3): 285–297, doi:10.4141/s00-075, The present paradigm views humus as a system of heteropolycondensates, largely produced by the soil microflora, in varying associations with clay (Anderson 1979). Because this conceptual model, and simulation models rooted within the concept, do not accommodate a large char component, a considerable change in conceptual understanding (a paradigm shift) appears imminent.
  12. ^ Mao, J.-D.; Johnson, R. L.; Lehmann, J.; Olk, D. C.; Neves, E. G.; Thompson, M. L.; Schmidt-Rohr, K. (2012). "Abundant and stable char residues in soils: implications for soil fertility and carbon sequestration". Environmental Science and Technology. 46 (17): 9571–9576. Bibcode:2012EnST...46.9571M. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.698.270. doi:10.1021/es301107c. PMID 22834642.
  13. ^ "Isolation of IHSS Soil Fulvic and Humic Acids | IHSS". Retrieved 2024-10-24.
  14. ^ "Isolation of IHSS Aquatic Humic and Fulvic Acids | IHSS". Retrieved 2024-10-24.
  15. ^ Lamar, Richard T; Olk, Daniel C; Mayhew, Lawrence; Bloom, Paul R (2014-05-01). "A New Standardized Method for Quantification of Humic and Fulvic Acids in Humic Ores and Commercial Products". Journal of AOAC International. 97 (3): 721–730. doi:10.5740/jaoacint.13-393. ISSN 1060-3271. PMID 25051616.
  16. ^ "Isolation of NOM by Reverse Osmosis | IHSS". Retrieved 2024-10-24.
  17. ^ "Effects of Humic Acid on Animals and Humans: An Overview of Literature and a Review of Current Research" (PDF). vet servis.
  18. ^ Nebbioso A. and Piccolo A. (2012). "Advances in humeomics: Enhanced structural identification of humic molecules after size fractionation of a soil humic acid". Analytica Chimica Acta. 720: 77–90. doi:10.1016/j.aca.2012.01.027. PMID 22365124.
  19. ^ Drosos M. and Piccolo A. (2018). "The molecular dynamics of soil humus as a function of tillage". Land Degradation & Development. 29 (6): 1792–1805. doi:10.1002/ldr.2989. S2CID 135445097.
  20. ^ a b Piccolo, A. (2002). The Supramolecular structure of humic substances. A novel understanding of humus chemistry and implications in soil science. Advances in Agronomy. Vol. 75. pp. 57–134. doi:10.1016/S0065-2113(02)75003-7. ISBN 978-0-12-000793-6.
  21. ^ Ponomarenko, E.V.; Anderson, D.W. (2001), "Importance of charred organic matter in Black Chernozem soils of Saskatchewan", Canadian Journal of Soil Science, 81 (3): 285–297, doi:10.4141/s00-075
  22. ^ a b Stevenson F.J. (1994). Humus Chemistry: Genesis, Composition, Reactions. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
  23. ^ a b Olk, D. C.; Bloom, P. R.; Perdue, E. M.; McKnight, D. M.; Chen, Y.; Farenhorst, A.; Senesi, N.; Chin, Y.-P.; Schmitt-Kopplin, P.; Hertkorn, N.; Harir, M. (2019). "Environmental and Agricultural Relevance of Humic Fractions Extracted by Alkali from Soils and Natural Waters". Journal of Environmental Quality. 48 (2): 217–232. doi:10.2134/jeq2019.02.0041. ISSN 0047-2425. PMID 30951132.
  24. ^ Tipping, E (1994). "'WHAM – a chemical equilibrium model and computer code for waters, sediments, and soils incorporating a discrete site/electrostatic model of ion-binding by humic substances". Computers and Geosciences. 20 (6): 973–1023. Bibcode:1994CG.....20..973T. doi:10.1016/0098-3004(94)90038-8.
  25. ^ Ghabbour, E.A.; Davies, G. (Editors) (2001). Humic Substances: Structures, Models and Functions. Cambridge, U.K.: RSC publishing. ISBN 978-0-85404-811-3. {{cite book}}: |author2= has generic name (help)
  26. ^ Weil, Ray R.; Brady, Nyle C. (2017). The Nature and Properties of Soils (15th ed.). Columbus, Ohio: Pearson Education (published April 2017). p. 549. ISBN 978-0-13-325448-8. LCCN 2016008568. OCLC 936004363. [new analytical techniques have] found very little in the way of humic macromolecules in mineral soils. Instead, evidence suggests that the alkali extraction process itself actually creates giant polymers from smaller biomolecules.
  27. ^ Oliver, Barry G. (1983). "Dihaloacetonitriles in drinking water: Algae and fulvic acid as precursors". Environmental Science & Technology. 17 (2): 80–83. Bibcode:1983EnST...17...80O. doi:10.1021/es00108a003. PMID 22295957.
  28. ^ Peters, Ruud J.B.; De Leer, Ed W.B.; De Galan, Leo (1990). "Dihaloacetonitriles in Dutch drinking waters". Water Research. 24 (6): 797. doi:10.1016/0043-1354(90)90038-8.
  29. ^ Lapedes, Daniel N., ed. (1966). McGraw-Hill encyclopedia of science and technology: an international reference work, Volume 12. McGraw-Hill. p. 428. ISBN 978-0070452657. The value of adding organic matter to the soil in the form of animal manures, green manures, and crop residues for producing favorable soil tilth has been known since ancient times
  30. ^ Pan American Union. Dept. of Cultural Affairs. División de Fomento Científico, Pan American Union. Dept. of Scientific Affairs, Organization of American States. Dept. of Scientific Affairs (1984). Ciencia interamericana: Volumes 24–27. And since plants have shown their ability to absorb and translocate the complex molecules of systemic insecticides, they can no longer discredit the idea that plants are able to absorb the soluble humic nutrients, containing by far ...{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  31. ^ Arancon, Norman Q.; Edwards, Clive. A.; Lee, Stephen; Byrne, Robert (2006). "Effects of humic acids from vermicomposts on plant growth". European Journal of Soil Biology. 42: S65–S69. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.486.2522. doi:10.1016/j.ejsobi.2006.06.004.
  32. ^ Cooper, R. J.; Liu, Chunhua; Fisher, D. S. (1998). "Influence of Humic Substances on Rooting and Nutrient Content of Creeping Bentgrass". Crop Science. 38 (6): 1639. doi:10.2135/cropsci1998.0011183X003800060037x.
  33. ^ Liu, Chunhua; Cooper, R. J. (August 1999). "Humic Substances Their Influence on Creeping Bentgrass Growth and Stress Tolerance" (PDF). TurfGrass Trends: 6.
  34. ^ Kuznetsova, Alsu; Cullingham, Catherine; McKenzie, Debbie; Aiken, Judd M. (November 2018). "Soil humic acids degrade CWD prions and reduce infectivity". PLOS Pathogens. 14 (11): e1007414. doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1007414. PMC 6264147. PMID 30496301.
  35. ^ a b Tang, Chunyu; Li, Yuelei; Song, Jingpeng; Antonietti, Markus; Yang, Fan (2021-06-25). "Artificial humic substances improve microbial activity for binding CO2". iScience. 24 (6): 102647. Bibcode:2021iSci...24j2647T. doi:10.1016/j.isci.2021.102647. ISSN 2589-0042. PMC 8387571. PMID 34466779.
  36. ^ Yakimenko, Olga; Stepanov, Andrey; Patsaeva, Svetlana; Khundzhua, Daria; Osipova, Olesya; Gladkov, Oleg (3 July 2021). "Formation of Humic-Like Substances during the Technological Process of Lignohumate Synthesis as a Function of Time". Separations. 8 (7): 96. doi:10.3390/separations8070096.
  37. ^ Gong, Guanqun; Xu, Liangwei; Zhang, Yingjie; Liu, Weixin; Wang, Ming; Zhao, Yufeng; Yuan, Xin; Li, Yajun (3 November 2020). "Extraction of Fulvic Acid from Lignite and Characterization of Its Functional Groups". ACS Omega. 5 (43): 27953–27961. doi:10.1021/acsomega.0c03388. PMC 7643152. PMID 33163778.
  38. ^ "Youngs, R.W. & Frost, C.M. 1963. Humic acids from leonardite – a soil conditioner and organic fertilizer. Ind. Eng. Chem., 55, 95–99" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2010-06-01. Retrieved 2022-03-18.
  39. ^ Newcomer, Robert W.; Nybo, John P.; Newcomer, Jacob K. (2020). "Humate in the upper Cretaceous Fruitland Formation in northwestern New Mexico" (PDF). New Mexico Geological Society Special Publication. 14: 41–46. Retrieved 26 October 2020.
  40. ^ McLemore, Virginia T. (2020). "Uranium deposits in the Poison Canyon trend, Ambrosia Lake Subdistrict, Grants Uranium District, McKinley and Cibola Counties, New Mexico" (PDF). New Mexico Geological Society Special Publication. 14: 53–63. Retrieved 26 October 2020.
  41. ^ Yurishcheva, A.A.; Kydralieva, K.A.; Zaripova, A.A.; Dzhardimalieva, G.I.; Pomogaylo, A.D.; Jorobekova, S.J. (2013). "Sorption of Pb2+ by magnetite coated with humic acids". J. Biol. Phys. Chem. 13 (2): 61–68. doi:10.4024/04YU13A.jbpc.13.02.
  42. ^ Lucas, A.; Harris, J.R. (1998). Ancient Egyptian Materials and Industries. New York: Dover Publications. p. 62. ISBN 978-0-486-40446-2.
[edit]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Humic_substance&oldid=1257622439"