Note to the reviewing admin: I tagged this as replaceable fair use because the file was being used as the primary means of identification of the artist in the main infobox. The file, however, appears to have been inadvertantly moved there and has since been replaced by a freely licensed equivalent image of the artist himself. The NFCC#8 issues I raised related to the file's non-free use are also being addressed by the addition of more sourced critical commentary about it to the file's caption, and (possibly) later on to the relevant section of the article itself. I am only leaving the rfu template up because it has been disputted and am not sure if it would be proper to remove one template without removing the other as well. -- Marchjuly (talk) 21:26, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I'm fine with both templates being removed; it's proper if you want to withdraw it, and I obviously consent to you withdrawing your RFU objection. postdlf (talk) 21:31, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
