Draft talk:Sigma male
Appearance
This is the talk page of a redirect that targets the page: • Sigma male Because this page is not frequently watched, present and future discussions, edit requests and requested moves should take place at: • Talk:Sigma male |
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. |
This redirect was nominated at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion on 29 November 2021. The result of the discussion was retarget. |
The contents of the Draft:Sigma male page were merged into Alpha and beta male on September 26, 2023. For the contribution history and old versions of the merged article please see its history. |
Bruh
[edit]bruh does this really need to exist? 209.221.91.105 (talk) 19:23, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
- this is great, saving a link before i try to revertWeigurde 11:14, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
andrew tate?
[edit]some people think he is a sigma GarethBaloney (talk) 21:44, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
Why.
[edit]Why is this on Wikipedia. Tell me why? Because like that same person who commented on the talk page of Skibidi Toilet is right about this. 2601:406:4200:8E90:99C3:2C97:6734:A4E8 (talk) 18:54, 16 September 2023 (UTC)
- Well, the same reason as any page's reason for existence: because there's a large amount of reliable, significant coverage for it. ser! (chat to me - see my edits) 19:20, 16 September 2023 (UTC)