Draft:Vincent Blok
Submission declined on 13 June 2024 by SafariScribe (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|
Submission declined on 11 February 2024 by Ruud Buitelaar (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject. Declined by Ruud Buitelaar 8 months ago. |
Submission declined on 5 January 2024 by Sungodtemple (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs to
This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies. Declined by Sungodtemple 9 months ago. |
Submission declined on 5 January 2024 by Idoghor Melody (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. Declined by Idoghor Melody 9 months ago. |
- Comment: An article requires multiple reliable, third-party or independent sources that write about the subject, see WP:IS. The present article has maybe one - the first one. The remainder is WP:CITEKILL and WP:RESUME. I am pretty sure prof. Blok is notable enough to have a Wikipedia article, but this article does not prove it and does not have the right tone. About tone, see WP:EPSTYLE. The lede section for example is too long. The phrase about one of the most daring attempts seems to be the blurb from one of Blok´s books. That is not neutral and dispassionate. Ruud Buitelaar (talk) 01:59, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: External links should be removed or converted to inline citations where appropriate.See also WP:COI. Greenman (talk) 15:48, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: External links should not be placed in the body of an article. Instead you can create an 'External links' section with appropriate external links after the References section. Sungodtemple (talk • contribs) 13:57, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
Vincent Blok (born 30 July 1970, in Scheveningen) is professor at the Wageningen University, specialised in philosophy of technology, environmental philosophy and responsible innovation[1], scientific director of the 4TU Centre for Ethics of Technology[2], a collaboration of the four Technical Universities in the Netherlands, and project leader of the AI for Sustainable Food Systems laboratory, that researches the ethical, legal and social aspets (ELSA) of AI[3]. In his research, Blok reflects on the meaning of contemporary disruptive events like digitalisation and global warming for the human condition and its environment from a continental philosophical perspective.[4] He is also member of the boad of the Society for Philosopohy and Technology[5] and associate editor of various academic journals, such as Philosophy & Technology[6], Journal of Responsible Innovation[7] and Philosophy of Management[8]. Blok's philosophy of technology has been described as "One of the most daring attempts to think through the general impact of technology".[9]
Education
[edit]Blok studied philosophy with a.o Wouter Oudemans, Gerard Visser and Herman Philipse at Leiden University. He wrote his doctoral thesis on the philosophical method of Martin Heidegger and Ernst Jünger, under the supervision of Wouter Oudemans, and obtained his PhD in 2005.[10] From 2006-2010, Blok was CEO of the Louis Bolk Institute, a research institute in the field of sustainable agriculture, nutrition and health care.[11]
Theories and Methods
[edit]Blok works on the intersection between philosophy of technology and philosophical method. His dissertation, published in 2005, tried to answer the question how philosophers can reflect on the age of technology if their own way of doing philosophy is already affected by technology.[12] To answer this question, he studied the philosophy of technology of Martin Heidegger and Ernst Jünger. In the following years, he wrote a monograph on the philosophy of technology of Ernst Jünger (2017).[13] Subsequently, here wrote a monograph on Heidegger's philosophical method (2019)[14], that "offers an impressive and, in all likelihood, sustainable contribution to the discourse on method in contemporary philosophy".[15] Later he became more critical about Heidegger's conceptualization of the technological world as a reservoir of resources that is present for exploitation, as it overlooks the role of concrete disruptive innovations.[16] At the same time, he was critical about the pure focus on artefacts and practices in many contemporary philosophies of technology. They miss that new artefacts like AI driven applications are embedded in a particular ontological structure of the World. In order to integrate both perspectives, he developed a concept of ecological hermeneutic phenomenology that considers both the physical level of new technologies - the innovation process leading to the emergence of new disruptive technologies - and the meta-physical level of the ontological structure of the World in which these technologies are embedded.[17]
In this context, he also developed a philosophy of innovation to broaden the concept of technology and consider the process-dimension of technological evolution next to the outcome-dimension of innovation.[18] He also opened a philosophical perspective on biomimicry as a new paradigm of sustainable technology[19] in the Anthropocene[20], that contributed to the further development of philosophy of sustainable technology.[21]
Bibliography
[edit]Books in English
[edit]- Blok, V. (2017), Ernst Jünger’s Philosophy of Technology. Heidegger and the Poetics of the Anthropocene (Routledge)[13]
- Blok, V. (2019), Heidegger’s Concept of philosophical Method (Routledge)[14]
- Blok, V. (2021), The Critique of Management. Toward a Philosophy and Ethics of Business Management (Routledge)[22]
- Blok, V. (2023), Philosophy of Technology in the Digital Age. The datafication of the World, the homo virtualis, and the capacity of technological innovations to set the World free (Wageningen University)[17]
Books in Dutch
[edit]- Blok, V. (2005), Rondom de vloedlijn. Filosofie en kunst in het machinale tijdperk. Een confrontatie tussen Heidegger en Jünger (Aspect)[12]
- Blok, V. (2022), Van wereld naar aarde. Filosofische ecologie van een bedreigde planeet (Boom, in Dutch).[23]
Articles
[edit]Blok published numerous articles that are published open access and available via Academia or Researchgate
External links
[edit]
References
[edit]- ^ "prof.dr. V (Vincent) Blok". WUR. 2012-09-04. Retrieved 2024-01-05.
- ^ "ABOUT US | 4TUEthics". ethicsandtechnology.eu. Retrieved 2024-01-05.
- ^ Heer, Marloes de. "home". ELSA | AI for Sustainable Food Systems. Retrieved 2024-01-05.
- ^ Blok, Vincent (2012-09-04). "prof.dr. V (Vincent) Blok". WUR. Retrieved 2024-01-05.
- ^ "SPT Board – SPT". Retrieved 2024-01-06.
- ^ "Philosophy & Technology". Springer. Retrieved 2024-01-06.
- ^ "Journal of Responsible Innovation".
- ^ "Philosophy of Management". SpringerLink. Retrieved 2024-01-06.
- ^ Ritter, Martin (2023-04-11). "Towards a Terrestrially Ontological Philosophy of Technology". Foundations of Science. doi:10.1007/s10699-023-09916-x. ISSN 1572-8471.
- ^ Rondom de vloedlijn (Thesis). Leiden University. Archived from the original on 19 Feb 2024.
- ^ "About". vincentblok.nl. 2021-07-12. Retrieved 2024-01-05.
- ^ a b Blok, Vincent (2005). Rondom de Vloedlijn: filosofie en kunst in het machinale tijdperk; een confrontatie tussen Heidegger en Jünger. Soesterberg, NL: Uitg. Aspekt. ISBN 978-90-5911-102-8.
- ^ a b Blok, Vincent (2017). Ernst Jünger's Philosophy of Technology: Heidegger and the Poetics of the Anthropocene. Routledge, Taylor & Francis. ISBN 9781138737594. Retrieved 2024-01-05.
- ^ a b Blok, Vincent (2020). Heidegger's concept of philosophical method: innovating philosophy in the age of global warming. Routledge studies in twentieth-century philosophy. New York London: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group. ISBN 978-0-367-41812-0.
- ^ Reijers, Wessel (2021-03-01). "Blok, Vincent: Heidegger's concept of philosophical method: innovating philosophy in the age of global warming". Continental Philosophy Review. 54 (1): 99–106. doi:10.1007/s11007-020-09513-w. ISSN 1573-1103.
- ^ Blok, Vincent (2023-09-01). "The Ontology of Technology Beyond Anthropocentrism and Determinism: The Role of Technologies in the Constitution of the (post)Anthropocene World". Foundations of Science. 28 (3): 987–1005. doi:10.1007/s10699-022-09829-1. ISSN 1572-8471.
- ^ a b Blok, Vincent (2023). Philosophy of technology in the digital age: the datafication of the world, the homo virtualis, and the capacity of technological innovations to set the world free. Wageningen University & Research. ISBN 9789464479126.
- ^ Blok, Vincent (2021). "What Is Innovation? Laying the Ground for a Philosophy of Innovation" (PDF). Techne. 25 (1): 72–96.
- ^ Blok, Vincent; Gremmen, Bart (2016-04-01). "Ecological Innovation: Biomimicry as a New Way of Thinking and Acting Ecologically". Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics. 29 (2): 203–217. Bibcode:2016JAEE...29..203B. doi:10.1007/s10806-015-9596-1. ISSN 1573-322X.
- ^ Blok, Vincent; Philosophy Documentation Center (2017). "Earthing Technology: Toward an Eco-centric Concept of Biomimetic Technologies in the Anthropocene". Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology. 21 (2): 127–149. doi:10.5840/techne201752363. ISSN 2691-5928.
- ^ Zwart, Hub (2017-06-08). "From the Nadir of Negativity towards the Cusp of Reconciliation: A Dialectical (Hegelian-Teilhardian) Assessment of the Anthropocenic Challenge". Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology. doi:10.5840/techne20176565.
- ^ Blok, Vincent (2022). The critique of management: toward a philosophy and ethics of business management. New York, NY London: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-032-14000-1.
- ^ Blok, Vincent (2022). Van wereld naar aarde. Filosofische ecologie van een bedreigde planeet. ISBN 9789024445042.