Draft:Kingofshrinivash
| Submission declined on 10 April 2024 by Jeromeenriquez (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|  |
| Submission declined on 6 November 2023 by Dan arndt (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you. Declined by Dan arndt 12 months ago. | |
| Submission declined on 1 November 2023 by Fade258 (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies. Declined by Fade258 12 months ago. | |
| Submission declined on 1 November 2023 by Theroadislong (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by Theroadislong 12 months ago. | |
Comment: This draft copies most of Bhai Lakhi Rai Banjara. If this is not a hoax, then you should remove all duplications. Randykitty (talk) 10:25, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
shrinivash Banjara | |
|---|---|
| Born | 23 October 2005 Delhi |
| Other names | Shrinivash Banjara is also known by many people as KingOfSrinivash, who is his grandfatherBhai Lakhi Rai Banjara |
| Education | National Forensic Sciences University |
| Relatives | Bhai Lakhi Rai Banjara (Grandfather) |
Shrinivash Banjara (23 October 2005 – ) is a Banjara king, Asian businessman, civil contractor and owner of twelve villages located in Delhi Gujarat Panjab & Lahore Hariyana.also supplying goods for the government
Shrinivash Banjara is also known by many people as King of Srinivash, who is his grandfather Bhai Lakhi Rai Banjara
Relations with Shirinivash
[edit]Shrinivash Banjara, is a businessman who travels the world, Businesses based in Delhi use to organize active businesses in Delhi
References
[edit]Notes
[edit]
SHRINIVASH BANJARA