Draft:Corruption in public procurement
 | Review waiting, please be patient.
This may take 7 weeks or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 1,255 pending submissions waiting for review.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
Reviewer tools
|
Corruption in public procurement is any dishonest practices that occur during the process of acquiring goods and services by government entities. This form of corruption undermines public trust, distorts market competition, and can lead to significant financial losses for governments and taxpayers.
Nature of Corruption in Public Procurement
[edit]Corruption in public procurement can manifest in various ways, including bribery, bid rigging, and conflicts of interest. Public officials may solicit or accept bribes to favor certain bidders, manipulate tender specifications to exclude competitors, or engage in collusive bidding practices. Such actions not only compromise the integrity of the procurement process but also result in inflated costs and substandard services or goods being delivered to the public sector.[1][2]
Common Forms of Corruption
[edit]Bribery
[edit]Public officials may receive illicit payments from contractors in exchange for awarding contracts or providing favorable treatment during the procurement process.[3]
Bid Rigging
[edit]This involves collusion among bidders to manipulate the bidding process, ensuring that certain companies win contracts at inflated prices.[4][1]
Conflict of Interest
[edit]Officials may have personal interests in certain companies and may act in ways that benefit those companies at the expense of fair competition.[3][5]
Fraudulent Invoicing
[edit]Contractors may submit false invoices for services not rendered or goods not delivered, leading to financial losses for public entities.[2][6]
Impact of Corruption on Public Procurement
[edit]The consequences of corruption in public procurement are profound. It can lead to Financial Losses, as estimates suggest that corruption can inflate contract costs by 10% to 25%, with some cases exceeding 50% of a contract's value due to fraudulent practices.[5] Also, it can cause Erosion of Public Trust. When citizens perceive that public procurement processes are corrupt, it undermines their trust in government institutions and public officials in general.[6] Lastly, It leads to reduced quality of services. Corruption often results in lower quality goods and services being provided, as contractors may cut corners to maximize profits from inflated contracts.[3][4]
Strategies for Combating Corruption
[edit]To address corruption in public procurement, several strategies can be implemented. Enhancing Transparency, implementing transparent bidding processes and making procurement data publicly accessible can reduce opportunities for corrupt practices.[7] Strengthening Regulations, as governments should establish clear regulations regarding conflicts of interest and enforce strict penalties for corrupt activities within procurement processes. Utilizing Technology, as the use of technology, such as AI and data analytics, can help detect irregularities in procurement patterns and flag potential corruption risks before they escalate.[7] Civil Society Engagement. as encouraging civil society organizations to monitor procurement processes can provide an additional layer of oversight and accountability.[3]
Conclusion
[edit]Corruption in public procurement remains a significant challenge worldwide, affecting economic stability and governance. By implementing robust anti-corruption measures and promoting transparency, governments can work towards mitigating these risks and ensuring that public funds are utilized effectively for the benefit of society.
References
[edit]- ^ a b "Preventing Corruption in Public Procurement" (PDF). 2016.
{{cite web}}:|first=missing|last=(help) - ^ a b International, Transparency (2010). "Corruption and Public Procurement" (PDF).
- ^ a b c d "The nature of corruption in public procurement". U4 Anti-Corruption Resource Centre. Retrieved 2024-11-21.
- ^ a b Decarolis, Francesco; Giorgiantonio, Cristina (December 2022). "Corruption red flags in public procurement: new evidence from Italian calls for tenders". EPJ Data Science. 11 (1): 16. doi:10.1140/epjds/s13688-022-00325-x. ISSN 2193-1127. PMC 8933377. PMID 35371906.
- ^ a b Abdou, Aly; Basdevant, Olivier; David-Barrett, Elizabeth; Fazekas, Mihaly (2022-05-20). "Assessing Vulnerabilities to Corruption in Public Procurement and Their Price Impact". IMF Working Papers. 2022 (94). doi:10.5089/9798400207884.001.A001 (inactive 2024-11-21).
{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: DOI inactive as of November 2024 (link) - ^ a b "The government missed a trick to fight fraud and corruption in its new Procurement Bill". Spotlight on Corruption. 2023-06-20. Retrieved 2024-11-21.
- ^ a b Gabinete (2023-11-21). "Artificial Intelligence and the fight against corruption". Antifraucv. Retrieved 2024-11-21.