Draft:Comparative Poetics

Submission declined on 17 May 2024 by CanonNi (talk).

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you have not resolved the issues listed above, your draft will be declined again and potentially deleted.
If you need extra help, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors.
Please do not remove reviewer comments or this notice until the submission is accepted.

Where to get help

If you need help editing or submitting your draft, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. These venues are only for help with editing and the submission process, not to get reviews.
If you need feedback on your draft, or if the review is taking a lot of time, you can try asking for help on the talk page of a relevant WikiProject. Some WikiProjects are more active than others so a speedy reply is not guaranteed.

How to improve a draft

Wikipedia:Contributing to Wikipedia – a basic overview on how to edit Wikipedia.
Help:Wikitext – how to use the markup
Help:Referencing for beginners – how to include references
Wikipedia:Article development – how to develop your article
Wikipedia:Writing better articles – how to improve your article
Wikipedia:Verifiability – make sure your article includes reliable third-party sources

You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article.

Improving your odds of a speedy review

To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags.

Add tags to your draft

Editor resources

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Easy tools: Citation bot (help) | Advanced: Fix bare URLs

Declined by CanonNi 10 days ago. Last edited by CanonNi 10 days ago. Reviewer: Inform author.

Resubmit

Please note that if the issues are not fixed, the draft will be declined again.

Submission declined on 17 May 2024 by HitroMilanese (talk).

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Declined by HitroMilanese 11 days ago.

Comment: Please see Help:Referencing for beginners '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk • contribs) 22:51, 17 May 2024 (UTC)

Comparative poetics is concerned with the comparative study of different poetics, or theories of literature. the dominance of Western theories has hindered a comprehensive understanding of world poetics, as previous attempts at comparative poetics by scholars like James J.Y. Liu, Earl Miner, Stephen Owen, Wai-lim Yip, and Mohit K. Ray failed to establish a unifying approach. Alaa Abd al-Hadi's Nucleo-genre Paradigm offers a solution by providing a universally oriented framework that respects cultural specificities while identifying common structural elements across different genres and cultures.

Abd al-Hadi's paradigm, which is based on qualitative logic and fuzzy sets. It distinguishes between two levels of genre: the poetic level of production and the aesthetic level of reception, with the latter being given primacy. This approach allows for cross-cultural communication and understanding by focusing on the essential elements that define a genre, rather than the aesthetic elements that vary across cultures. The paradigm also avoids the problems of closure, ahistoricality, and definitive belonging by being open to constant evolution and change, thus understanding its historicality and the role of time in the development of genres.

The Nucleo-genre Paradigm is structured around the concept of a "Homogeneous Medium," without which a genre does not ontologically exists, and "Isomers," or the structural elements that are common to all manifestations of a genre, and "Isotopes," which are the aesthetic elements that differ from one place and time to another and thus do not affect the genre's identity. This framework can theoretically predict new genres and explain existing ones by considering the union of different isomers into an Arch-isomer and the evolution of genres through the Arch-isotope.

In conclusion, the Nucleo-genre Paradigm is presented as a significant advancement beyond comparative poetics, offering a humanist perspective that accounts for the sociocultural and historical contexts of literary and artistic manifestations. It provides a theoretical framework for examining various literary and artistic forms and finding the constants where they intersect, thereby contributing to a more inclusive and universally applicable understanding of world poetics.

References[edit]

<Othman, A. (June 2023) Beyond comparative poetics: An evaluation of The Nucleo-genre Paradigm. Journal of Advanced Research in Social Sciences. 6(2), https://doi.org/10.33422/jarss.v6i2.829>

<Othman, A. (September 2023). The nature-nurture controversy: The Nucleo-Genre Paradigm as a means of understanding gender. Journal of Advanced Research in Social Sciences. 6(3), 10.33422/jarss.v6i3.984>