Draft:Arjun Sharda
 | A major contributor to this article appears to have a close connection with its subject. (September 2023) |
| Submission declined on 26 September 2023 by DoubleGrazing (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|  |
| Submission declined on 18 May 2023 by Pythoncoder (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. | |
| Submission declined on 16 May 2023 by Greenman (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject. | |
| Submission declined on 2 May 2023 by Ts12rAc (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. | |
Comment: I should probably be rejecting this outright, but let's give it one more chance to demonstrate notability. Of which there is currently no evidence. DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:27, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
- Comment:
"He is known for his projects in the tech industry"
, seriously? -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:26, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
 | This article about an American inventor is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |
Arjun Sharda | |
|---|---|
| Occupation(s) | Coder, innnovator, author, speaker, tech entrepreneur |
| Years active | 2021-present |
Arjun Sharda is an American tech entrepreneur and coder. He is known for his projects in the tech industry.[citation needed]
Career[edit]
Sharda has published a book, named "The Salesperson's Direction to Clients", in April 2023 [1].
Sharda has also been known for his open-source projects, such as NextGuild to revolutionize how traditional libraries work.[1]
Sharda has also made a former organization, "Making Bots Fun", to make bots on the Discord platform which are now open-sourced and archived.[1]
Arjun has also spoken [1] in-person & online[2] at DeveloperWeek CloudX 2023.
Awards & Accomplishments[edit]
Arjun has been given the world record for being the world's youngest computer programmer at 9 years 118 days.[3]
Sharda has also received certificates from programs offered by organizations such as Stanford University, Meta, Google, and Amazon Web Services[1]
References[edit]
- ^ a b c d e Spikes, Maya (8 June 2023). "Young tech student breaks world record while starting his entrepreneurial journey". Rising Innovator. Retrieved 2023-06-24.
- ^ "Developerweek CloudX -- PRO TALK: Leveraging AI and ML: Best Practices and Use Cases". DeveloperWeek. Retrieved 2023-06-24 – via sched.com.
- ^ "World's Youngest Computer Programmer". Record Holders Republic. 2023-04-18. Retrieved 2023-06-24.
Category:Living people
Category:Year of birth missing (living people)
Category:American child businesspeople
Category:American people of Indian descent
Category:American computer programmers