Draft:Accident causation
 | Review waiting, please be patient.
This may take 7 weeks or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 1,252 pending submissions waiting for review.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
Reviewer tools
|
Accident causation is the study of the underlying factors and sequences of events that lead to accidents. Understanding accident causation is essential for developing effective prevention measures in workplaces, transportation, and public spaces. By examining the root causes of accidents, safety professionals can implement strategies to mitigate hazards and improve safety protocols. Accident causation theories date back to the early 20th century, with various models developed to address different types of accidents and human errors.
History and Development
[edit]The study of accident causation began with Herbert W. Heinrich, a pioneering safety theorist who introduced the Domino Theory in the 1930s.[1] According to Heinrich, most accidents are caused by a chain of sequential events, or "dominoes," each of which must fall for an accident to occur. His model emphasized unsafe acts as a major cause of accidents, suggesting that removing one "domino" in the sequence could prevent the accident entirely.
Since Heinrich, many other models have emerged to address the complexity of accidents. Prominent theories include the Human Factors Theory, which attributes accidents to human errors, and the Systems Theory, which considers broader organizational and environmental factors in accident causation.
Key Theories of Accident Causation
[edit]Domino Theory
[edit]The Domino Theory, developed by Heinrich, posits that accidents occur due to a chain of events. Each "domino" represents a factor such as human error, mechanical failure, or environmental condition. Heinrich’s theory remains influential but has faced criticism for its emphasis on human error and neglect of systemic issues.[2]
Human Factors Theory
[edit]The Human Factors Theory suggests that accidents result from a combination of overload, inappropriate responses, and inappropriate activities by individuals. This model emphasizes cognitive, physical, and psychological factors, particularly in high-stress environments where human performance is crucial. This theory is widely applied in industries such as aviation and healthcare.[3]
Systems Theory
[edit]The Systems Theory looks at the interaction between people, machines, and the environment, suggesting that accidents are the result of system failures rather than isolated events. This model is particularly applicable in complex and high-risk industries where multiple systems interact, such as nuclear energy and chemical manufacturing.[4]
Contributing Factors in Accident Causation
[edit]Human Error
[edit]Human error is a major contributor to accidents in various sectors. This includes errors of omission, where individuals fail to perform necessary actions, and errors of commission, where incorrect actions are taken. Understanding human error is critical for developing training and ergonomic improvements that reduce error likelihood.[3]
Environmental Hazards
[edit]Environmental factors, such as poor lighting, extreme temperatures, and noise, can increase the likelihood of accidents. Environmental hazards are particularly significant in construction and mining industries, where workers are frequently exposed to challenging conditions.[5]
Organizational Factors
[edit]Organizational factors, including management practices, policies, and workplace culture, also play a role in accident causation. Research shows that safety culture, leadership, and clear communication can significantly reduce accidents.[6]
Modern Approaches to Accident Causation
[edit]Root Cause Analysis (RCA)
[edit]Root Cause Analysis (RCA) is a systematic process used to identify the underlying causes of accidents. RCA tools, such as fishbone diagrams and the “Five Whys,” are used across industries to dig deeper into accident data and uncover hidden factors contributing to incidents. [7]
Swiss Cheese Model
[edit]Developed by James Reason, the Swiss Cheese Model visualizes accident causation as a series of barriers with "holes" that represent weaknesses. When the holes align, an accident can occur. This model is widely used in healthcare and aviation to understand how system failures contribute to accidents.[8]
Safety-II and Resilience Engineering
[edit]Safety-II, a modern approach to accident prevention, focuses on understanding why things go right instead of why they go wrong. It aims to build resilient systems that can adapt to unexpected situations, minimizing accident risks even in uncertain environments.[9]
Applications of Accident Causation Theories
[edit]Accident causation theories are applied across multiple industries, from manufacturing and transportation to healthcare and energy. Each industry tailors these theories to address specific risks. In healthcare, for instance, the Swiss Cheese Model has been used to analyze medical errors, while the Human Factors Theory is commonly applied in aviation to design ergonomic cockpits and reduce pilot error.[10]
References
[edit]- ^ "Domino Theory". Safeopedia. Retrieved 2024-11-01.
- ^ Heinrich H. W. (1941). Industrial Accident Prevention (1941). Mcgraw-hill Book Company Inc., New York and London.
- ^ a b Reason, James (1990-10-26). Human Error. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-31419-0.
- ^ Leveson, Nancy G. (2012-01-13). Engineering a Safer World: Systems Thinking Applied to Safety. MIT Press. ISBN 978-0-262-29730-1.
- ^ Geller (1999-09-30). Working Safe: How to Help People Actively Care for Health and Safety. CRC-Press. ISBN 978-0-8019-8732-8.
- ^ Hopkins, Andrew (2005). Safety, Culture and Risk: The Organisational Causes of Disasters. CCH Australia. ISBN 978-1-921022-63-0.
- ^ Latino, Robert J.; Latino, Kenneth C.; Latino, Mark A. (2011). Root cause analysis: improving performance for bottom-line results (4th ed.). Boca Raton, Fla.: CRC Press. ISBN 978-1-4398-5092-3.
- ^ Reason, James (2016-01-29). Managing the Risks of Organizational Accidents. Routledge. ISBN 978-1-134-85542-1.
- ^ Hollnagel, Erik (2018-04-17). Safety-I and Safety-II: The Past and Future of Safety Management. CRC Press. ISBN 978-1-317-05979-0.
- ^ "The Field Guide to Understanding 'Human Error'". Routledge & CRC Press. Retrieved 2024-11-01.