Category talk:Mass media franchises

This category was nominated for deletion on 7 May 2006. The result of the discussion was keep.

This category is within the scope of WikiProject Media franchises, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to media franchises on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Media franchisesWikipedia:WikiProject Media franchisesTemplate:WikiProject Media franchisesmedia franchise articles

Brands

This category is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles

Media

This category is within the scope of WikiProject Media, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MediaWikipedia:WikiProject MediaTemplate:WikiProject MediaMedia articles

WikiProject Media To-do List:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Mackay Radio
Cleanup : Media influence, Video game culture, Sound bite
NPOV : Content (media and publishing)
Verify : Multimedia, Alternative media, Alternative newspaper
Other :
- Answer requests for comments

re: Category:Franchises

User:FollowTheSigns, my apologies. I did not check the page history before I re-added Category:Franchises and therefore did not see that you just previously removed it. I decided that it serves our readers better if this category remains. Indeed, it was precisely because I was looking specifically for a media franchises category that I started at Category:Franchises, which seemed the most logical. As to your argument that it's "not in the legal sense", technically yes, you're right. But I don't think we should limit this category to just the legal sense. Why can't we have it more broad? Perhaps removing the hatnote pointing to Franchising as being the "main article for this category" will avoid confusion? On second thought, perhaps a better compromise would be to add to the hatnote something like "... For media franchises, see Category:Media franchises"? -- œ^™ 03:41, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]